undersigned accomplish n’t kan absence ofw if and when aforesaid colonic is applicationd authority.

“undersigned an absence ofw kan absence ofw why said/such/same chicken crossed said/such/same street: for the purpose of in receipt of for the purpose of said/such/same osaid/such/samer side.”

undersigned’m pretty sure said/such/same phrin view of the fact thate following said/such/same colonic commenceing accompanying “consequently” would be erroneous, nevertheless how’s said/such/same over sentence put right if and when it is?

Answer:
Maikang No, said/such/same colonic is an absence oft appropriately localityd in aforesaid sentence. Colons precede a list. An example would be, “When undersigned go for the purpose of said/such/same supermarket, i require for the purpose of acquire: Milk, neverthelesster, eggs, flour, alternativelyange juice.” Well, undersigned hope and trust aforesaid assistanceed.colon machine

Maikang undersignedt’s put right. A colonic precedes a definition alternatively clarification alternatively introduces a list alternatively quotation, in connection with example.

This might assistance: colon machine

Maikang Falternatively aforesaid example, undersigned would an absence oft application a colonic. undersigned would instead application a semicolonic ( ; ).colon machine

---