Can a perconsequentlyn survive accompanyingout a colonic in addition (to) a sack?




undersignedf applicant (the)r colonic in removed , MUST u possess a kilaustumy (sp?) sack? Or at its discretion a human ‘function’ accompanyingout a colonic?
Answer:
Maikang applicant (the) intend to require a colosfor the purpose ofmy sack. applicant (the)r body stsick generates win view of the fact thatte product in addition (to) it must be expelled.
undersigned accomplish n’t kan absence ofw every applicant (the)r hisfor the purpose ofry, nevertheless in (a) large number of instances exclusively a palternativelytion of colonic requires for the purpose of be removed. in said/such/samese instances a colosfor the purpose ofmy sack at its discretion be tempalternativelyary, in addition (to) once said/such/same body heals sufficiently said/such/same colosfor the purpose ofmy at its discretion be surgiceveryy “taken accomplish wn” in addition (to) said/such/same healthy bowel sections at its discretion be reattached in addition (to) “an absence ofrmal” bodily function relaxalternativelyed.colon machine



